Article proposes a critique of a policy or practice with specific action proposals or suggestions.
Article follows conventions of academic research article — e.g. position in literature, cited sources, and claimed contribution.
Article is based on developments that have not yet occurred.
Article is based on formal logic or mathematical technique.
Language quality: 2/2*
Standard of English expression in article is excellent.
Scope of debate: 2/2
Article addresses an issue which is widely known and debated.
Most related sources are mentioned in article [this is an invitation to careful selection rather than a demonstration of prowess in citation collection — i.e. apt and representative choices made in source citations.
Logical flow: 2/2*
Ideas are well organised in article.
The argument presented in article is new.
Review impact: 2/2
The article has been significantly changed as a result of the review process
Reviewers indicate their appreciation of the article in the form of a 50 word statement.
The revised article links each section more effectively to the case study. The role of women’s knowledge has been expanded and better explained. It has been proofread and edited down.
I recommend this article for publication. It is very rare that the Western hegemonic model of a knowledge commons is being interrogated from an indigenous perspective. I have really enjoyed reading this article.