Issue editors: Mathieu O\u2019Neil (University of Canberra) and Stefano Zacchiroli (University Paris Diderot and Inria)<\/em><\/p>\n The increasing production of value by entities which are not compensated for their labour means the ranks of unemployed people keep growing. We often confuse being \u2018unemployed\u2019 with being \u2018unworked\u2019, but what it really means is that we are \u2018unwaged\u2019. There is a lot of work to be done, but for that to happen it needs to be separated from employment. Where does peer production fit in? On the one hand, the passionate labour and abjuration of exclusive property rights over the goods they produce of participants in peer production occur at the expense of less fortunate others, who do not have the disposable income, cultural capital, or family support to engage in unpaid labour.<\/p>\n On the other, we should avoid an overly singular or \u2018capitalocentric\u2019 view of the economy. New forms of solidarity can be imagined. An increasingly large free public goods and services sector could well cohabit in a plural economy with employment in cooperatives, paid independent work, and the wage-earning of the commercial sector. The peer-reviewed articles in this tenth issue of the Journal of Peer Production trace the contours of these emerging assemblages through case studies of an\u00a0online encyclopedia, a herbarium, a scientific project, mathematical schoolbooks, and\u00a0\u2018maker\u2019 activities. The Editorial Section addresses the interplay of capital and commons in firms and peer\u00a0projects. It argues that it is time for the Journal of Peer Production to move beyond an exclusive focus on the institutions of the commons, in order to research and help develop the ecology, regulations and culture which can grow the commons.<\/p>\n Making Lovework: Editorial Notes for the JoPP issue on Peer Production and Work<\/b> From the Commons to Capital: Red Hat, Inc. and the\u00a0Business of Free Software<\/strong> Preliminary Report on the Influence of Capital in an Ethical-Modular Project: Quantitative data from the 2016 Debian Survey<\/b> Now, the Commons<\/b> <\/p>\n Producing a Knowledge Commons: Tensions Between Paid Work and Peer\u00a0Production in a Public Institution<\/strong> Crowdsourcing Citizen Science: Exploring the Tensions Between Paid Professionals and Users<\/strong> Makers as a New Work Condition Between Self-employment and Community Peer-production. Insights from a survey on Makers in Italy.<\/strong> Communal Work and Professional Involvement: the Balance of Open Source Projects<\/strong> A Critical Political Economic Framework for Peer Production’s Relation to Capitalism<\/strong> <\/p>\n The Journal of Peer Production now accepts\u00a0unsolicited submissions of papers. If you\u00a0have pertinent articles which do not fit into a special issue theme, please submit to the Varia<\/em> editor, Peter Troxler,\u00a0by\u00a0posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list:\u00a0jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org.\u00a0We are pleased to open the JoPP\u00a0Varia<\/em> series with two articles:<\/span><\/p>\n Common sense: An Examination of Three Los Angeles Community WiFi Projects that Privileged Public Funding over Commons-based Infrastructure Management<\/strong> \u201cThink Global, Print Local\u201d: A Case study of a Commons-based Publishing and Distribution Model<\/strong> Issue 10:\u00a0May 2017 Issue editors: Mathieu O\u2019Neil (University of Canberra) and Stefano Zacchiroli (University Paris Diderot and Inria) The increasing production of value by entities which are not compensated for their labour means the ranks of unemployed people keep growing. We often confuse being \u2018unemployed\u2019 with being \u2018unworked\u2019, but what<\/p>\n
\nEditorial Section<\/h1>\n
\nMathieu O’Neil, Stefano Zacchiroli [html<\/a>]<\/p>\n
\nBenjamin J. Birkinbine [html<\/a>]<\/p>\n
\nMolly de Blanc, Mathieu O’Neil, Mahin Raissi, Stefano Zacchiroli [html<\/a>]<\/p>\n
\nJournal of Peer Production\u00a0[html<\/a>]<\/p>\nPeer Reviewed Papers<\/a><\/h1>\n
\nLorna Heaton, Patricia Dias da Silva [html<\/a>]<\/p>\n
\nJamie Woodcock, Anita Greenhill, Kate Holmes, Gary Graham, Joe Cox, Eun Young Oh, Karen Masters [html<\/a>]<\/p>\n
\nMassimo Menichinelli, Massimo Bianchini, Alessandra Carosi, Stefano Maffei\u00a0[html<\/a>]<\/p>\n
\nClement Bert-Erboul\u00a0[html<\/a>]<\/p>\n
\nArwid Lund\u00a0[html<\/a>]<\/p>\nVaria<\/a><\/h1>\n
\nGwen Shaffer [html]<\/a><\/p>\n
\nVasilis Kostakis, Stacco Troncoso, Ann Marie Utratel [html]<\/a><\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"