{"id":2238,"date":"2014-03-03T01:12:00","date_gmt":"2014-03-03T01:12:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peerproduction.net\/?page_id=2238"},"modified":"2014-10-30T20:26:05","modified_gmt":"2014-10-30T20:26:05","slug":"issue-4-value-and-currency","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/peerproduction.net\/editsuite\/issues\/issue-4-value-and-currency\/","title":{"rendered":"Issue #4: Value and currency"},"content":{"rendered":"
Editorial Notes<\/strong> Peer production has often been described as a \u2018third mode of production\u2019, irreducible to State or market imperatives. The creation and organisation of peer projects allegedly take place without \u2018managerial commands\u2019 or \u2018price signals\u2019, without recourse to bureaucratic apparatuses or the logic of competitive markets. Instead, and mimicking the technical architectures upon which many peer projects are based, production is described as non-hierarchical and decentralised. Group dynamics are also commonly described as \u2018flat\u2019 and this is captured, of course, in the very notion of the \u2018peer\u2019. When tested against the realities of actual projects, however, such early conceptions of peer production are, at best, in need of further elaboration and qualification. At worst, they were always off the mark. Hierarchies persist in peer production, as does competition and market-like arrangements…\u00a0html<\/a><\/p>\n \u2018Karma, precious Karma!\u2019 Karmawhoring on Reddit and the Front Page\u2019s Econometrisation<\/strong> The Paradoxes of Distributed Trust: Peer-to-Peer Architecture and User Confidence in Bitcoin<\/strong> The Politics of Cryptography: Bitcoin and the Ordering Machines<\/strong> Reproducing Wealth Without Money, One 3D printer at a Time<\/strong> Why Contractors Make More Money Than Employees<\/strong> Can Bitcoin Compete with Money?<\/strong> Towards the Democratization of the Means of Monetization: The Three Competing Value Models Present Within Cognitive Capitalism<\/strong> Between Copyleft and Copyfarleft: Advance Reciprocity for the Commons<\/strong> Editorial Notes Nathaniel Tkacz, Nicolas Mendoza and Francesca Musiani Peer production has often been described as a \u2018third mode of production\u2019, irreducible to State or market imperatives. The creation and organisation of peer projects allegedly take place without \u2018managerial commands\u2019 or \u2018price signals\u2019, without recourse to bureaucratic apparatuses or the<\/p>\n
\nNathaniel Tkacz, Nicolas Mendoza and Francesca Musiani<\/em><\/p>\npeer reviewed papers<\/a><\/span><\/h2>\n
\nby Annika Richterich html<\/a><\/p>\n
\nby Alexandre Mallard, C\u00e9cile M\u00e9adel and Francesca Musiani\u00a0html<\/a><\/p>\n
\nby Quinn DuPont html<\/a><\/p>\n
\nby\u00a0Johan S\u00f6derberg html<\/a><\/p>\nInvited Comments<\/span><\/h2>\n
\nby Amir Taaki html<\/a><\/p>\n
\nby Beat Weber html<\/a><\/p>\n
\nby Michel Bauwens html<\/a><\/p>\n
\nby Miguel Said Vieira & Primavera De Filippi html<\/a><\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"